The interplay between statutory valuation rules and real-world transaction prices often sparks disputes under Section 56(2)(x). In Aathmika Holdings Pvt. Ltd., the Chennai ITAT was called upon to decide whether a negotiated third-party price could override the formula-based FMV prescribed by Rule 11UA.
You may also like
Commercial Logic vs. Statutory Letter: The ₹240 Crore Tax Lesson in the Sterling Holiday Decision
The recent ruling by the Mumbai Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in the case of Sterling Holiday Resorts Limited v. DCIT serves as a stark reminder of the “structural tension” between commercial...
4 days ago
Pricol Autotech: Leading India’s Shift Toward Software-Defined Vehicles
Pricol Limited (Pricol) announced a strategic restructuring through the demerger of its Driver Information & Connected Vehicle Solutions (DICVS) business into a new entity, Pricol Autotech Limited (PAL). This...
6 days ago
Kotak-Deutsche Bank Deal: Whether retreat by global capital or strategic shift?
Kotak Mahindra Bank announced it is buying Deutsche Bank’s retail banking, affluent private banking and wealth management business in India. The deal covers roughly ₹29,000 crore in loans, ₹16,000 crore in deposits...
1 week ago



