Dutch engineering firm Arcadis confirms $5 billion bid from WSP

Industry:    13 hours ago

Dutch engineering consultancy group Arcadis said on Friday it ​had received a second unsolicited takeover bid from Canadian peer WSP ‌Global, confirming a Reuters report from Thursday.

Amsterdam-listed shares of Arcadis, which closed 11.5% higher the night before following the report, jumped another 9.5% to their highest price since October.

The board ​unanimously rejected a first offer of €48.5 per share, saying it “fundamentally undervalued ​the company”, and is now reviewing a revised proposal of €51.5 apiece, ⁠Arcadis said in a statement.

Reuters reported on Thursday that Toronto-listed WSP had ​been working on a possible bid for Arcadis over the last year, citing ​two people familiar with the matter. Other potential suitors included large-cap private equity firms, the people said.

Arcadis said in the statement that the first offer had not addressed concerns ​around “strategic fit, cultural fit, deal certainty and other stakeholders’ interests”.

The upgraded bid ​would imply an equity value of €4.4 billion ($5.0 billion), or €5.2 billion including Arcadis’ debt which stood ‌at €797 ⁠million in 2025, according to Reuters’ calculations.

In a note to investors, Jefferies said the new offer price would be in line with Arcadis’ historical valuation.

The company was worth nearly €6 billion at its peak in August 2024, but has ​since lost more than ​a third of ⁠its value.

“Blending WSP’s serial acquisition-led growth culture with the continuity mission of Arcadis’ largest shareholder would not be easy,” ​said Kristof Samoy, analyst at KBC Securities.

Arcadis’ top shareholder ​with a ⁠19% stake is an employee foundation called Stichting Lovinklaan.

WSP confirmed it submitted an indicative, non-binding proposal to Arcadis on July 23, adding that no definitive agreement had ⁠been ​reached and any potential transaction remained subject to ​the two companies agreeing on terms.

Shares of WSP were up nearly 1%.

Lovinklaan was not immediately available ​for comment.

print
Source: